claudiometer: looking up from a case file (o rly?)
Claudia Donovan ([personal profile] claudiometer) wrote in [community profile] synopsychic2017-10-13 12:21 am

Snag it, bag it and tag it

So I'm thinking it might be time to consider stealing the amulet and giving the pieces to people who'll actually use it. It's not gonna do anyone a damn bit of good sitting in this museum, that's for sure.

The real trick is going to be, well, stealing it, considering it managed to animate the suits of armor in here. That might outstrip whatever mundane security's on the place - I can handle people and technology, but this might even be a step beyond Artifact snagging. We should get the Forest Folk bit to those guys ASAP, but we at least have investigators who can relay it.

We also, uh. Need to be able to tell the pieces apart.

So. Who's in, what can you bring to the table, and what say we shoot for next week? Best chance of planning something that doesn't go totally pear-shaped.
rebellioninbloom: (πŸ’š10)

[personal profile] rebellioninbloom 2017-10-15 09:02 am (UTC)(link)
... excuse me, but I think I must be missing a lot of the story myself, here.

[Everything between 'dungeon' and 'proximity' ... is a bit lost, right now.]
rebellioninbloom: (πŸ’š06)

[personal profile] rebellioninbloom 2017-10-18 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah. No, I would have to say I completely agree on that front.

[At least Treasures tended to be safe once they were ... in the clear?]
rebellioninbloom: (πŸ’š09)

[personal profile] rebellioninbloom 2017-10-18 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm glad we never had to deal with multiple part ... items, at least. That would have been quite bothersome.

[What would a multi-part Treasure even have represented? A more complex chain of ... not that it matters now.]